Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults

COMMENT:
There are a few key findings here -
1. Vitamin D supplementation reduces mortality by about 6% over an average of two years.
2. Only Vitamin D3, the natural form we use, shows that effect. The Vitamin D2 that doctors prescribe (e.g.: rocaltrol) does not show that effect.

So you can reduce your chances of dying by a significant amount by making sure your levels of natural Vitamin D are appropriate. The article does show some downside to the Vitamin D supplementation with a slight increase in kidney stones, which is most likely due to some people getting too high levels of D. This is why it's so important to test your blood levels, rather then just supplement.

You can find more information in the article I wrote about The Importance of Testing Vitamin D in our Fall newsletter

CITATION: 1. G B, LL G, D N, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults. Available at: http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab007470.html [Accessed July 9, 2011].

ABSTRACT
Background
The available evidence on vitamin D and mortality is inconclusive.

Objectives
To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of vitamin D for prevention of mortality in adults.

Search strategy
We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (to January 2011). We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and asked experts and pharmaceutical companies for additional trials.

Selection criteria
We included randomised trials that compared vitamin D at any dose, duration, and route of administration versus placebo or no intervention. Vitamin D could have been administered as supplemental vitamin D (vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol)) or an active form of vitamin D (1α-hydroxyvitamin D (alfacalcidol) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)).

Data collection and analysis
Six authors extracted data independently. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratios (RR). To account for trials with zero events, meta-analyses of dichotomous data were repeated using risk differences (RD) and empirical continuity corrections. Risk of bias was considered in order to minimise risk of systematic errors. Trial sequential analyses were conducted to minimise the risk of random errors.

Main results
Fifty randomised trials with 94,148 participants provided data for the mortality analyses. Most trials included elderly women (older than 70 years). Vitamin D was administered for a median of two years. More than one half of the trials had a low risk of bias. Overall, vitamin D decreased mortality (RR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.00, I2 = 0%). When the different forms of vitamin D were assessed separately, only vitamin D3 decreased mortality significantly (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98, I2 = 0%; 74,789 participants, 32 trials) whereas vitamin D2, alfacalcidol, or calcitriol did not. Trial sequential analysis supported our finding regarding vitamin D3, corresponding to 161 individuals treated to prevent one additional death. Vitamin D3 combined with calcium increased the risk of nephrolithiasis (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34, I2 = 0%). Alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased the risk of hypercalcaemia (RR 3.18, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.68, I2 = 17%). Data on health-related quality of life and health economics were inconclusive.

Authors' conclusions
Vitamin D in the form of vitamin D3 seems to decrease mortality in predominantly elderly women who are mainly in institutions and dependent care. Vitamin D2, alfacalcidol, and calcitriol had no statistically significant effect on mortality. Vitamin D3 combined with calcium significantly increased nephrolithiasis. Both alfacalcidol and calcitriol significantly increased hypercalcaemia.